This information has been uploaded in connection with a Lines of Flight seminar that took place on the 6th April, 2016.
Difference and sustainability within and between practice-led PhDs
and PhDs by design
At the moment in the School and in discussion with the PhD by
Design conferences, that some of us have been involved in, there
have been many recurring questions about the difference between a
practice-led PhD and PhD by Design and what forms they take in
Architecture – so we would like to bring this to the table. If you have
examples of PhDs or ways of working within your own research bring
them. It would be good to start to build up a resource between us of
our collective knowledge in this area.
When analysing examples of both practice-led PhDs and PhDs by
Design, we would also like to frame the discussion through
sustainability. When and how a PhD is sustainable? Are some PhDs
more sustainable then others? Can we extrapolate tips and strategies
from these examples for our own project/research?
C – Carolyn Butterworth, Ca – Caterina Giuliani, T – Teresa Hoskyns,
A – Andreas Lang, D – Doina Petrescu, H – Helen Stratford, J – Julia Udall
H – Organised the seminar as a way to discuss research into different types of
Practice-led PhDs and PhDs by design. I’ve looked at 3 types – All different. Made
diagrams to see how I can organise my PhD related to these different types that
were useful for thinking through the format of my PhD and how practice can be
embedded within the structure. Black indicates theory and red practice.
Diagram type 3 – related to Apolonija Šušteršič’s PhD where conversations were
used as a structure – one large project and then conversations were in dialogue
with it – through art practice – Dan Graham, Architectural social practice – Meike
Schalk and art/architecture historic context Mariska van den Berg
D – Question of the use of conversations within Architectural PhD – maybe less
rigid research requirements in Art Practice – see example by Irena Bauman which
was theoretically framed with a specific REF output – so conversation is possible
but it needs to be framed academically.
H – Presentation of other PhDs – Diagram 2 relates to Sophie Handler’s PhD
Exemplary in that her PhD sits comfortably within an academic framework yet the
performative methodology is completely aligned with the practice / gap the PhD is
C – Question of practice-based or practice-led – RMIT for example is based on a
portfolio of projects to which the PhD is applied.
H – Diagram 1 is based on Tom Holbrook’s PhD– where the practice becomes a
reference point keyed into the arguments.
D – Helen’s practice (Diagram 4) – is an example of action research – questioning
/ blurring boundaries between practice and theory – new piece of work is
developed through the PhD. Ways of constructing the PhD so it is a constantly
1. reflection on theory through theory
2. reflection on practice through theory
3. reflection on practice through practice
4. reflection on theory through practice
C – Maybe this follows the PhD by design model – new piece of work tests out
theories. Similarity to musical PhDs where the outcome is a new composition.
T – At the PhD by design conference at Goldsmiths (Nov 2015) there seemed to
be a split between more Practice-led research focused and PhDs by design, which
didn’t involve the outside – not real projects – rather a hypothesis or innovation for
industry funded partner.
C – Sounds like Helen’s PhD is very similar to the Research Circle.
A – My practice focuses on applied and situated research. Within this context the
academic framework can be seen as problematic – can see diagram 3 being the
most useful as a systematic way of looking at the work.
Thinking about the question of sustainability in relation to funding – the ability to
produce work and the framing this brings. Recently asked to make a handbook for
LADC on temporary use but recent research project was exactly critiquing that
Question about how decisions get made or shifts occur and that this is most
effective in practice. Based in theories around democracy as a practice, conflict as
a practice – based in acting it out, in the negotiation is the practice the critical point
– values need to be practiced.
D – But theoretical values give actions a use value – the theory you are making
through practice. Marxist viewpoint bring to life ideas and concepts in different
H – Make them visible
C – I’m working with uncertainty with teaching as the area of research within the
PhD, within the context of the privatisation of education. Questioning the desire to
innovate. Bringing in the new vs staying in the same place over time – being far
away vs. being here. Questioning viewpoint that being in the same place limits the
capacity to innovate.
D – PhD then is tactically questioning use-value as a grey area. Notion that
working over time has a different impact on the researcher and the researched.
Community as a process that you can influence and time as a research element.
J – My PhD was about defining tools that reflect on what and how, some pushing
theory, some bringing theory and practice closer together – looking at different
roles within those tools.
‘Design As Distributed Agency,’ Tom Holert
Design also related to how you design a meeting. Difference between each set of
Ethics – need to find a creative way of addressing within the context of the practice
Ca – PhD focusing on social design within a precise context – alternative
education models. PhD will inform a new form and new strands within my own
practice, new way of thinking/working. I wanted to bring in the question of
sustainability, in term of where will the PhD take you? Does it provide time and
space for own research. How to retain criticality – one leg in community research
and one leg in academia?
A – For me its about opening up other spheres – taking another form of influence –
providing an acknowledgement of practice within an academic framework.
D – Moving between worlds – it’s important to maintain practice based within the
community as it provides a different understanding than occasional immersions. It
provides a sustained contribution to knowledge. Loyalty to a community and to a
project is sustainable. Important to be strategic in research – rethink continuously
– what is needed where are the gaps.
T – PhD is a space to be honest and to be critical
D – How will a PhD help your practice?
A – It will provide a research role – academic value. Take away from the day to
day – strategic role where research is related to practice – enable funding from
D – It can also lead to institutional role – development agency – policy making – as
leverage to influence and to change. Example is Sophie Handler in Manchester
University and Manchester Institute for Collaborative Research on Ageing.
T – In an Academic context the PhD provides a means to be reflective to theorise
practice and to justify it within an academic context – making the practice
architecture. Ecobox introducing a sophisticated discourse into ‘local squatting’ –
raises the level and puts it out there.
A – I see using the PhD to take influence through and contribute to practice
usefully – focus on what best at and what would like to do best. Moreover in terms
of sustainability – is it possible to live out of that? Working with Queen Mary was
good as used tactically as a source / resource.
D – It’s important to be aware of the recognition framework / impact– in academic
context the key thing is REF output. Research-based practice should focus on how
it can instrumentalise practice- become research grant holder. Demystifying
Architectural Research – useful reference sourcebook.
PhD structure 1 diagram
phd structure 2 diagram
PhD structure 3 diagram
phd structure_Jan 2017 diagram
Practice-led PhDs and PhDs by Design
PhD by Design theses
School of Arts and Communication (K3) at Malmö Unviersity. Online resource
Designing For Homo Explorens: Open Social Play in Performative Frames
2014 – School of Arts and Communication – K3, Malmö University.
Practice-led PhDs in Architecture
Learning from a participatory art project in a trans-local neighbourhood – 2013
Malmo Faculty of Fine and Performing Arts, Lund University
The Bartlett UCL
Some available online
or available for request from UCL Library Store
A little bit of TLC – or, the Ludological Curatrix : developing an alternative urban practice of
elderly care – 2011
Ana Paola Oliveira Araujo
Patterning : envisioning strategies for thinking and fabricating architecture through the
textile-inspired procedures of repeating, masking and scaling – 2009
Learning-through- Touring: a new design methodology for situated learning derived through
touring the built environment – 2010 (reflective analysis)
School of Architecture & Design
Between the Lived and the Built:
Foregrounding the User in Design for the Public Realm – 2011
Between Furniture & Infrastructure: Expanding Disciplinarity – 2014
Practice-led but more about the writing practice within the PhD
The Bartlett UCL
Emma Jane Cheatle Part-architecture : the Maison de Verre through the Large Glass –
Poetics and Place – The Architecture of Sign, Subjects and Site (published) 2014
PhDs by Design in Architecture (published)
The Bartlett UCL
The Architecture Chronicle – Diary of an Architectural Practice – 2009
The Inhabitable Flesh of Architecture – 2014
Practice-led PhDs in Visual Art Practice
The view: a historicized and contemporary socio-political mediation – 2015
Central St Martins
A space to house nothing : examining the spatial complexities of nothingness, emptiness,
zero and void to define the space of nothing, through the adoption of architectural themes
and forms of representation in selected conceptual art projects since 1958
Neil Robert Wenman – 2009 (annotated portfolio) UCL